EPA Plays Chicken with Emission Regulations
by
FILED IN: The Biofiles
New studies show that operations from chicken farms generate more ammonia emissions annually than oil refineries and steel mills combined in poultry heavy states. About 8 times more. And now the EPA is pushing for an exemption for the poultry industry so they wouldn’t have to report those or other harmful emissions, on grounds that they’re protected under federal “right to know” laws.
The Bush administration is hoping to get the exemption passed in January, before you-know-who takes office. That’s a whole lot of weird, even for this administration—so what’s the big stink over poultry?
For starters, broiler producers in the ten states with the most poultry farms unleashed a massive 481,764,049 pounds of ammonia in 2007, multiple studies have shown. Though there aren’t any specified air quality standards for ammonia put forth by the EPA, companies are nonetheless required to report their emissions.
Ammonia is a toxic substance—it can cause major irritation to the skin, eyes, and throat, and it can cause coughing and burns. It can even lead to more serious long term respiratory problems.
And that explains why the poultry industry is lobbying the EPA for the exemption in the first place. The strange part is that it looks as though the exemption may be granted, not just for poultry, but for all livestock operations nationwide. Which is baffling, because the likes of oil refineries and steel mills must report their emissions regularly without exception. The Environmental Integrity Project, the Sierra Club, and the Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment have all rallied against the exemption.
- by Brian Merchant, via Treehugger
SIMILAR ARTICLES
- All’s not well, down on the chicken farm The poultry industry is one of the most wasteful and cruellest intensive farming industries. Millions of male chicks are thrown into dustbins to die, at...
- Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis Biofuels have forced global food prices up by 75% - far more than previously estimated - according to a confidential World Bank report obtained by...
- Chevron — not the best neighbour US oil giant Chevron now fully owns the Caltex refinery in Milnerton, having recently bought out Texaco. But like marooned penguins in an oil slick,...
- Ten Reasons why the PBMR is not the answer Global warming and climate change pose a serious threat to societies of today and finding cleaner energy sources is a big challenge. It is evident...
- Ocean Fish Farms Won’t Save Wild Fish & Can Easily Destroy Them A new study in shows why and how ocean fish farms can hurt wild fish populations. Done by prof. Neil frazer of the university of hawaii...
- Making Bacon: the shocking truth Many people think of Charlotte’s Web and Babe when they imagine how pigs are raised for meat. Unfortunately, these Hollywood tales do not depict reality. Almost...
CURRENT ISSUE
Issue 29 of Biophile is going electronic and will be available soon. It will also be available to our international readers. Stay tuned or contact us for more details! find out more
EDITORIAL
I was just checking the website of the SEXPO which has just visited SA, this is what the Cape Town site says. . . . “The world’s largest Health, Sexuality and Lifestyle expo is coming back to Slaapstad and it’s bigger and sexier than ever! continue reading
ABOUT BIOPHILE
Biophile magazine is published every two months by Biophile cc. The magazine is edited by Chris Lautenbach, while subscriptions and advertising are managed by Lindsay Mitchell.
The telephone number is 021 789 0694 and you can send faxes to 086 514 9668 and letters to PO Box 39277 Capricorn Square 7948.
ECOTELLY
Visit Ecotelly.com for more videos
AWARD
Biophile recently received recognition for its contribution to the print & internet category at the 20th SAB Environmentalist & Environmental Journalists of the year Awards. Congratulations to a dedicated team!
SPONSOR
RECENT COMMENTS