Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 520

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 535

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 542

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 578

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 18

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/http.php on line 61

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class admin_subpages in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/post-plugin-library/admin-subpages.php on line 22

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::init() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 339

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::setup_is_valid() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 117

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::init_widgets() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 339

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::register_widget() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 152

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::register_widget() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 158

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::register_widget() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 158

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::register_widget() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 158

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method MP_Admin::roles_and_capabilities() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 339

Strict Standards: Non-static method MP_Admin::capabilities() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mailpress/mp-includes/class/MP_Admin.class.php on line 54

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method GoogleSitemapGeneratorLoader::Enable() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 339

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method cformsRSS::vars() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method cformsRSS::outputRSS() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 339
Biophile Magazine -- » The China Study

"We are constantly taking ideas from the spiritual world and forming them into our own conception of the things we desire. Sometimes the finished product does not satisfy or please us. That is because we have taken the idea away from its true parents, wisdom and love." Daily Guru

The China Study

by Linda Scott, MSc, Nutritional Medicine

FILED IN: Health and Food · Issue 21


Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Many books are given the epithet ‘groundbreaking’ but The China Study by Dr Colin Campbell and his son Thomas is one that truly deserves the accolade. Based on the biggest survey of the relationship between diet and disease ever done, the book rigorously examines the evidence and reaches several clear, and to many, startling dietary conclusions.

It seems that our high consumption of animal protein is undermining our health more than anything else, especially with regard to cancer, heart disease, obesity and diabetes.

Animal protein, otherwise referred to as first class protein, has been placed on a nutritional pedestal by almost everyone from nutritionists to government health advisors. And for many people protein equates with meat and meat is therefore the most desirable food to have on one’s plate. In this study Campbell knocks animal protein right off its perch.

As an American scientist investigating one of the most carcinogenic substances ever discovered — aflatoxin, a natural poison produced by a mould which grows on peanuts and maize — Campbell chanced upon some research done in India which quite literally changed his life and research focus. Two similar groups of rats were exposed to equal doses of aflatoxin which is strongly linked to liver cancer. One group was fed on a 20% protein diet and the other a 5% protein diet. This was the only difference between the two groups. The results were dramatic and every researcher’s dream for there was an unequivocal, if unexpected, outcome. Every single rat in the 20% protein group developed liver cancer or precursor lesions whereas not one single rat in the 5% protein group developed even the precursor signs of liver cancer.

The protein in question was casein, which is derived from cow’s milk. When he told his colleagues about the research they responded with disbelief. “They must have gotten the numbers on the animal cages reversed. In no way could a high-protein diet increase the development of cancer.” But Campbell could not let go of the intriguing possibility that protein, and in particular animal protein, could be driving the development of cancer in some way.

Research in the Philippines confirmed that aflatoxin was also implicated in the high incidence of human liver cancer, with children being particularly at risk. The consumption of mould-contaminated peanut butter and maize meal was to blame. On further inspection Campbell found that the children who developed liver cancer were also from the best-fed families and consumed more animal protein than anyone else in the country. This again, was not what was expected.

People like to blame chemicals rather than lifestyles or dietary habits for disease, and sometimes with very little real basis. For instance when it was discovered that sodium nitrite (a meat preservative which also imparts a pink colour to canned meats, bacon and hot dogs) might be producing nitrosamines in the body there was widespread panic.

Why? Because ‘low-dose’ nitrosamine consumption in a small group of rats led to a 35% death rate from throat cancer. However, the ‘low-dose’ group received extraordinary amounts of the chemical - the human equivalent of eating 270 000 pounds of bologna every day for over thirty years.

And yet when results showed that a 20% protein intake (well within the range of normal consumption levels in Western societies) experimentally turned on cancer in 100% of test animals given aflatoxin compared with no evidence of cancer in the 5% protein group, there was hardly a ripple in scientific circles.

Campbell decided to repeat the Indian research. He got similar results with all animals dead or nearly dead from liver cancer in the 20% group after two years while all the animals in the 5% protein group were still alive and active. He then switched the groups over midway so that the 5% protein group now got 20% and vice versa. The 5% group, which showed no cancer signs until then, quickly started to develop signs of cancer on the 20% protein diet. The 20% group, which had developed liver precursor cancer signs, showed evidence of reversal on the 5% diet. He then experimented with different amounts of aflatoxin and different types of protein and found that 20% animal protein was the culprit every time – no cancers developed using 5% protein diets or even 20% vegetable protein (from wheat or soya) diets. Then the results were replicated in other animals with different carcinogens and types of cancer, including mammary cancer.

What was going on?

There are three stages to cancer development, which Campbell likens to growing a lawn. First the seeds are planted (initiation), then they start germinating and growing (promotion), and finally they get out of control, invading flowerbeds and paving (progression). During initiation the genetic material in cells is damaged either by chemicals (carcinogens such as aflatoxin and manmade industrial and agricultural pollutants) or radiation leaving the cells, and all subsequent daughter cells, prone to the development of cancer. The damage is almost always irreversible and can happen very quickly – within minutes even.


During promotion the damaged cells start to multiply until they become clinically detectable as cancerous tumours. The promotion stage occurs over a much longer period, which can be many years in humans. The good news is that this stage is reversible in many cases. Like the grass seeds, the right conditions for growth need to be present for promotion and progression to happen, and to continue happening. And this is where dietary factors appear to play a major role, acting either as promoters or anti-promoters. The emerging pattern in this and other research involving other nutrients such as fish and meat protein and different types of dietary fats, Campbell writes, is that “nutrients from animal-based foods increased tumour development while nutrients from plant-based foods decreased tumour development.

How does this rather radical research apply to humans?

Protein requirements in rats and humans are remarkably similar. Protein should make up roughly 10% of both rat and human energy intake and Campbell found he could increase animal protein intakes to this level without adversely affecting the outcome in his rat experiments. This amounts to around 50-60g of protein per day for humans depending on body weight and total calorie intake. Yet many people in Western societies are consuming much more, with levels approaching 20%. It’s easy to see how with a 300g steak supplying around 75g protein, already more than the daily requirement.

Supportive human evidence was urgently required and this led Campbell on to the impressive China Study. When Chou EnLai, China’s premier in the early 1970s, was dying of cancer he ordered a comprehensive nationwide study of the death rates for twelve different types of cancer throughout China. It was a massive study involving 880 million citizens (96% of the country). In Europe and the US researchers get excited when there is 20% increase in cancer incidence in different areas of the country but in China some of the rates varied by a whopping 10,000%. With such a massive geographical variation in cancer rates in a population which is genetically and ethnically similar (87% Han people), the spotlight moved to environmental and lifestyle factors to account for the differences.

While the cancer variation was huge in China the overall average cancer incidence was far still far less than in Europe and the US, as it was with other so-called diseases of affluence including diabetes, heart disease, obesity and many others. But the core question remained – did diet have anything to do with the dramatic geographical variation in these diseases? Campbell and other researchers therefore took a ‘snapshot’ of the dietary situation in all the different Chinese counties using food intake surveys and blood levels of nutrients and biochemical markers such as cholesterol.

While the Chinese generally eat much less animal foods and more whole plant foods than people in the West, the predominant finding which emerged out of thousands of significant statistical correlations was that as the consumption of plant foods went up so the incidence of all these diseases went down, as well as all important biochemical risk markers such as cholesterol levels. Very few people, including doctors, know that animal protein is much more strongly correlated with blood cholesterol (the bad LDL type) than saturated fat or dietary cholesterol. Or that high cholesterol levels are not only linked to heart disease but also many types of cancer.

Saturated fat, mainly found in animal foods, has been regarded as the biggest nutritional baddie for many years. This has spawned a massive food industry around low-fat animal foods, which encouraged people to continue eating high levels of animal-based food in the belief that they had been rendered harmless.

However, recently released, rather shocking results from the Women’s Health Initiative, which tracked nearly 49,000 women for eight years, have thoroughly refuted this idea. Of the group that reduced their fat consumption to 20% of total calories (typical fat consumption is around 35-40% of calories), absolutely no reduction in health risk was observed. This again supports Campbell’s finding that excessive animal protein may be to blame for much of disease risk in the West.

Fad diets, like the Atkins diet which reduces carbohydrate intake but allows unlimited animal protein and fat, could therefore be doing far greater harm than good. Comparing intakes of the least active Chinese, the equivalent of office workers, Campbell found that while the Chinese had a 30% higher calorie intake their body weight was 20% lower. This could only be partly accounted for by a higher level of physical activity (e.g. cycling to work). The other important finding of the China Study is that diets low in protein and fat encourage more calories to be burned as heat rather than stored as fat. And it is this higher metabolic rate that is largely responsible for keeping obesity at bay, in spite of a much greater calorie consumption.

Campbell concludes that the results of the study were so personally convincing that he and his family have gone from a career of scoffing at vegetarians to eating an almost 100% whole foods, plant-based diet. “A diet that is good for preventing cancer is also good for the prevention of heart disease as well as every other disease of affluence including obesity, diabetes, cataracts, macular degeneration, Alzheimer’s’, cognitive dysfunction, multiple sclerosis, osteoporosis and more. When a whole, plant-based diet is demonstrably beneficial for such a wide variety of disease, is it possible that humans were meant to consume any other diet?”

Michael Pollan, author of the highly influential books, the Omnivore’s Dilemma and In Defence of Food agrees and proposes a new yet very old and simple answer to the question of what humans should be eating to maintain health.

Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.

And by food, he means real, unadulterated food as opposed to the many processed and highly adulterated products that masquerade as food, often trumpeting loud health claims. As he drolly comments, shoppers should not be misled by the relative ‘silence of the yams’ and other real foods with respect to their true health value.

Linda Scott has an MSc in Nutritional Medicine and is currently doing doctoral research in this field.

SIMILAR ARTICLES


Strict Standards: Non-static method SimilarPosts::execute() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/similar-posts/similar-posts.php on line 34

Strict Standards: Non-static method SimilarPosts::check_post_plugin_library() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/similar-posts/similar-posts.php on line 57

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method adsensem::filter_ads() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 166

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 245

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248

Strict Standards: Non-static method adsensem::filter_ad_callback() should not be called statically in /home/biophile/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adsense-manager/adsense-manager.php on line 248
  • Vegetarian Food A vegetarian menu is a powerful and pleasurable way to achieve good health.The vegetarian eating pattern is based on a wide variety of foods that...
  • Study reveals GM threats When a German court ordered Monsanto to make public a controversial 90-day rat study on June 20, 2005, the data upheld claims by prominent scientists...
  • A Natural, Wholesome Diet For Your Pets The concept of a natural, diet for our pets is no new revelation. Our parents, grandparents and great grandparents, certainly would have fed our pets...
  • Vondi’s holistic pet nutrition The latest spate of deaths owing to contaminated pet food has highlighted the importance of understanding your pet nutrition and correct feeding. Do you really...
  • South China Tiger Cub born in South Africa An extremely rare male South China tiger cub was born in the Free State province to proud parents Tiger Woods and Cathay. The birth of little...
  • Sugar addiction Scientists never really thought that a person could become hooked on sweets like they were a drug. Now a batch of findings is making researchers...

1 Comment »

  1. Excellent research described. I have come to the same conclusions on my own about high protein causing faster aging and I believe baldness, as well. The body just has to work too hard to ‘digest’ high caloric frankenfood which is truly everywhere these days despite a growing awareness amongst mainstream America

    Comment by Lori

Leave a comment

Subscribe to comments on this post

CURRENT ISSUE

Cover of Issue 28

Issue 29 of Biophile is going electronic and will be available soon. It will also be available to our international readers. Stay tuned or contact us for more details! find out more

EDITORIAL

I was just checking the website of the SEXPO which has just visited SA, this is what the Cape Town site says. . . . “The world’s largest Health, Sexuality and Lifestyle expo is coming back to Slaapstad and it’s bigger and sexier than ever! continue reading

ABOUT BIOPHILE

Biophile magazine is published every two months by Biophile cc. The magazine is edited by Chris Lautenbach, while subscriptions and advertising are managed by Lindsay Mitchell.
The telephone number is 076 9055 004 and you can send faxes to 086 514 9668.

ECOTELLY

Visit Ecotelly.com for more videos

AWARD

Award Web

Biophile recently received recognition for its contribution to the print & internet category at the 20th SAB Environmentalist & Environmental Journalists of the year Awards. Congratulations to a dedicated team!

SPONSOR